Friday, April 27, 2018
The moral hazard of writing about opioid addiction using the scientfic method
Take a look at the blog entry (click here). These researchers wanted to know if increasing access to narloxon creates moral hazard on the part of opioid users. In other words, would users be less careful in regulating dosage if they knew they were more likely to be saved from an overdose. The bloggers wrote a working paper which suggests that moral hazard did occur. Then they were attacked for writing such a paper on such a topic using the techniques that they did. I think this is one more instance where Carl Sagan would be unhappy with the state of research today.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
This is very interesting. The critic of "correlation does not imply causation" seems to be true always to some extent. Maybe they should run a regression analysis where they try to figure out what variables cause someone to overdose? But quantifying variables that are probably individual to each person's life story may also lead to ethics like issues...
ReplyDelete